南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）

数据安全是数据产权登记制度有效运行的基石。当前各地登记规范对安全保护义务的规定存在碎片化与笼统化问题，义务主体、客体、内容和责任要件模糊不清，亟待从解释论视角对登记场景下的安全保护义务进行体系化建构。首先，应厘清安全保护义务的主体。登记申请人与登记机构作为数据处理者，承担法定安全保护义务；提供登记服务的第三方机构作为受托数据处理者履行相应约定义务。数据安全保护义务的适用对象包括登记客体样本以及登记所涉及的相应数据信息集合。其次，须进一步细化各类主体的义务内容。其中登记申请人应履行登记前的数据清洗、脱敏等合规性处理义务；登记机构侧重平台安全防护、运维规范管理、制度流程完善与登记信息保障；相关服务机构以专业注意义务与保密义务为核心。最后，以侵权责任与违约责任协同互补完善责任机制，为数据产权登记安全保护义务的谱系构造提供学理支撑与规范解释。

Data security is fundamental to the effective operation of the data property rights registration system. However, current registration rules suffer from fragmented and vague stipulations regarding security protection obligations, primarily due to ambiguous subjects, objects, contents, and liability components. A systematic construction of these obligations from an interpretative perspective is urgently required. Firstly, the subjects of obligations must be clarified. Registration applicants and institutions, as data processors, bear statutory security obligations, while third-party service providers, as entrusted data processors, assume contractual duties. The objects of protection include both registered property samples and the data sets involved in registration. Secondly, the specific contents of obligations for different subjects require refinement. Applicants are obligated to perform pre-registration data desensitization and security review. Registration institutions should focus on platform security, standardized management, and robust safeguard mechanisms. Service agencies must prioritize professional diligence and confidentiality. Finally, leveraging the complementary nature of tort and contractual liability is essential to refine the civil liability system. This systematic approach aims to provide theoretical support and normative guidance for the security protection obligations within data property rights registration.